You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A ventilation intervention study in classrooms to improve indoor air quality: the FRESH study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Health, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1476-069x-12-110 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jeannette TM Rosbach, Machiel Vonk, Frans Duijm, Jan T van Ginkel, Ulrike Gehring, Bert Brunekreef |
| Abstract |
Classroom ventilation rates often do not meet building standards, although it is considered to be important to improve indoor air quality. Poor indoor air quality is thought to influence both children's health and performance. Poor ventilation in The Netherlands most often occurs in the heating season. To improve classroom ventilation a tailor made mechanical ventilation device was developed to improve outdoor air supply. This paper studies the effect of this intervention. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 50% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 185 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 182 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 28 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 14% |
| Researcher | 23 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 26 | 14% |
| Unknown | 44 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 37 | 20% |
| Environmental Science | 30 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 9% |
| Design | 9 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 29 | 16% |
| Unknown | 56 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 December 2023.
All research outputs
#15,048,620
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Health
#1,088
of 1,609 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,218
of 308,654 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Health
#15
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,609 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.0. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,654 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.