You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Genome alignment with graph data structures: a comparison
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Bioinformatics, April 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2105-15-99 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Birte Kehr, Kathrin Trappe, Manuel Holtgrewe, Knut Reinert |
| Abstract |
Recent advances in rapid, low-cost sequencing have opened up the opportunity to study complete genome sequences. The computational approach of multiple genome alignment allows investigation of evolutionarily related genomes in an integrated fashion, providing a basis for downstream analyses such as rearrangement studies and phylogenetic inference.Graphs have proven to be a powerful tool for coping with the complexity of genome-scale sequence alignments. The potential of graphs to intuitively represent all aspects of genome alignments led to the development of graph-based approaches for genome alignment. These approaches construct a graph from a set of local alignments, and derive a genome alignment through identification and removal of graph substructures that indicate errors in the alignment. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 9 | 21% |
| United States | 8 | 19% |
| Japan | 2 | 5% |
| Germany | 2 | 5% |
| Norway | 2 | 5% |
| Canada | 2 | 5% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 12 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 24 | 56% |
| Members of the public | 17 | 40% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 193 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 4% |
| Germany | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | 1% |
| Unknown | 173 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 49 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 12% |
| Other | 16 | 8% |
| Other | 32 | 17% |
| Unknown | 18 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 69 | 36% |
| Computer Science | 53 | 27% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 33 | 17% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 2% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 6% |
| Unknown | 21 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,080,645
of 25,706,302 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#82
of 7,735 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,355
of 242,091 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#2
of 118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,706,302 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,735 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,091 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.