You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Virtual microscopy system at Chinese medical university: an assisted teaching platform for promoting active learning and problem-solving skills
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medical Education, April 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-6920-14-74 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yanping Tian, Wengang Xiao, Chengren Li, Yunlai Liu, Maolin Qin, Yi Wu, Lan Xiao, Hongli Li |
Abstract |
Chinese medical universities typically have a high number of students, a shortage of teachers and limited equipment, and as such histology courses have been taught using traditional lecture-based formats, with textbooks and conventional microscopy. This method, however, has reduced creativity and problem-solving skills training in the curriculum. The virtual microscope (VM) system has been shown to be an effective and efficient educational strategy. The present study aims to describe a VM system for undergraduates and to evaluate the effects of promoting active learning and problem-solving skills. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Hungary | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 50% |
Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Czechia | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 106 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Lecturer | 13 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 12 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 9% |
Researcher | 8 | 7% |
Student > Master | 7 | 6% |
Other | 30 | 28% |
Unknown | 28 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 23% |
Social Sciences | 13 | 12% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 5% |
Psychology | 5 | 5% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 3% |
Other | 26 | 24% |
Unknown | 31 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2014.
All research outputs
#12,605,998
of 22,753,345 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#1,423
of 3,303 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,317
of 228,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#31
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,753,345 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,303 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,038 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.