↓ Skip to main content

Acute appendicitis: position paper, WSES, 2013

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Emergency Surgery, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Acute appendicitis: position paper, WSES, 2013
Published in
World Journal of Emergency Surgery, April 2014
DOI 10.1186/1749-7922-9-26
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ferdinando Agresta, Luca Ansaloni, Fausto Catena, Luca Andrea Verza, Daniela Prando

Abstract

Appendectomy is one of the most frequently performed operative procedures in general surgery departments of every size and category. Laparoscopic Appendectomy - LA - as compared to Open Appendectomy - OA - was very controversial at first but has found increasing acceptance all over the World, although the percentage of its acceptance is different in the various single National setting. Various meta-analyses and Cochrane reviews have compared LA with OA and different technical details. Furthermore, new surgical methods have recently emerged, namely, the single-port/incision laparoscopic appendectomy and NOTES technique. Their distribution among the hospitals, however, is unclear. Using laparoscopic mini-instruments with trocars of 2-3.5 mm diameter is proposed as a reliable alternative due to less postoperative pain and improved aesthetics. How to proceed in case of an inconspicuous appendix during a procedure planned as an appendectomy remains controversial despite existing study results. But the main question still is: operate or not operate an acute appendicitis, in the meaning of an attempt of a conservative antibiotic therapy. Therefore, we have done a literature survey on the performance of appendectomies and their technical details as well as the management of the intraoperative finding of an inconspicuous appendix in order to write down - under the light of the latest evidence - a position paper.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 2%
Unknown 49 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 8 16%
Student > Bachelor 8 16%
Other 7 14%
Student > Master 6 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 10%
Other 12 24%
Unknown 4 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 78%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Computer Science 1 2%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 5 10%