↓ Skip to main content

Normal tissue toxicity after small field hypofractionated stereotactic body radiation

Overview of attention for article published in Radiation Oncology, October 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
110 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
108 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Normal tissue toxicity after small field hypofractionated stereotactic body radiation
Published in
Radiation Oncology, October 2008
DOI 10.1186/1748-717x-3-36
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael T Milano, Louis S Constine, Paul Okunieff

Abstract

Stereotactic body radiation (SBRT) is an emerging tool in radiation oncology in which the targeting accuracy is improved via the detection and processing of a three-dimensional coordinate system that is aligned to the target. With improved targeting accuracy, SBRT allows for the minimization of normal tissue volume exposed to high radiation dose as well as the escalation of fractional dose delivery. The goal of SBRT is to minimize toxicity while maximizing tumor control. This review will discuss the basic principles of SBRT, the radiobiology of hypofractionated radiation and the outcome from published clinical trials of SBRT, with a focus on late toxicity after SBRT. While clinical data has shown SBRT to be safe in most circumstances, more data is needed to refine the ideal dose-volume metrics.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Philippines 1 <1%
Unknown 99 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 23%
Other 18 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 16%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 9%
Professor 6 6%
Other 25 23%
Unknown 7 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 63 58%
Physics and Astronomy 13 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Engineering 3 3%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 12 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2023.
All research outputs
#17,044,125
of 25,047,899 outputs
Outputs from Radiation Oncology
#1,076
of 2,113 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,391
of 99,640 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Radiation Oncology
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,047,899 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,113 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,640 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.