↓ Skip to main content

A high utility integrated map of the pig genome

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Biology, July 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
130 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
148 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A high utility integrated map of the pig genome
Published in
Genome Biology, July 2007
DOI 10.1186/gb-2007-8-7-r139
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sean J Humphray, Carol E Scott, Richard Clark, Brandy Marron, Clare Bender, Nick Camm, Jayne Davis, Andrew Jenks, Angela Noon, Manish Patel, Harminder Sehra, Fengtang Yang, Margarita B Rogatcheva, Denis Milan, Patrick Chardon, Gary Rohrer, Dan Nonneman, Pieter de Jong, Stacey N Meyers, Alan Archibald, Jonathan E Beever, Lawrence B Schook, Jane Rogers

Abstract

The domestic pig is being increasingly exploited as a system for modeling human disease. It also has substantial economic importance for meat-based protein production. Physical clone maps have underpinned large-scale genomic sequencing and enabled focused cloning efforts for many genomes. Comparative genetic maps indicate that there is more structural similarity between pig and human than, for example, mouse and human, and we have used this close relationship between human and pig as a way of facilitating map construction.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 2 1%
Italy 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Philippines 1 <1%
Unknown 139 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 34 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 20%
Student > Master 15 10%
Student > Bachelor 13 9%
Professor 9 6%
Other 24 16%
Unknown 23 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 56 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 14%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 9 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 3%
Other 19 13%
Unknown 29 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2023.
All research outputs
#6,298,484
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#3,031
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,888
of 78,813 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#20
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 78,813 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.