↓ Skip to main content

Methodology of health-related quality of life analysis in phase III advanced non-small-cell lung cancer clinical trials: a critical review

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Methodology of health-related quality of life analysis in phase III advanced non-small-cell lung cancer clinical trials: a critical review
Published in
BMC Cancer, February 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12885-016-2152-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Frédéric Fiteni, Amélie Anota, Virginie Westeel, Franck Bonnetain

Abstract

Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is recognized as a component endpoint for cancer therapy approvals. The aim of this review was to evaluate the methodology of HRQoL analysis and reporting in phase III clinical trials of first-line chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC). A search in MEDLINE databases identified phase III clinical trials in first-line chemotherapy for advanced NSCLC, published between January 2008 to December 2014. Two authors independently extracted information using predefined data abstraction forms. A total of 55 phase III advanced NSCLC trials were identified. HRQoL was declared as an endpoint in 27 studies (49 %). Among these 27 studies, The EORTC questionnaire Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 was used in 13 (48 %) of the studies and The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General was used in 12 (44 %) trials. The targeted dimensions of HRQoL, the minimal clinically important difference and the statistical approaches for dealing with missing data were clearly specified in 13 (48.1 %), 9 (33.3 %) and 5 (18.5 %) studies, respectively. The most frequent statistical methods for HRQoL analysis were: the mean change from baseline (33.3 %), the linear mixed model for repeated measures (22.2 %) and time to HRQoL score deterioration (18.5 %). For each targeted dimension, the results for each group, the estimated effect size and its precision were clearly reported in 4 studies (14.8 %), not clearly reported in 11 studies (40.7 %) and not reported at all in 12 studies (44.4 %). This review demonstrated the weakness and the heterogeneity of the measurement, analysis, and reporting of HRQoL in phase III advanced NSCLC trials. Precise and uniform recommendations are needed to compare HRQoL results across publications and to provide understandable messages for patients and clinicians.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 50 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 20%
Student > Master 5 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 10%
Other 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 16 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 36%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Psychology 2 4%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 20 40%