You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluation of normalization methods for two-channel microRNA microarrays
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Translational Medicine, July 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1479-5876-8-69 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yingdong Zhao, Ena Wang, Hui Liu, Melissa Rotunno, Jill Koshiol, Francesco M Marincola, Maria Teresa Landi, Lisa M McShane |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 40 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 19 | 45% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 6 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 48% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 10% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 2% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 8 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2016.
All research outputs
#7,536,586
of 22,994,508 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#1,248
of 4,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,993
of 95,214 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#6
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,994,508 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,019 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,214 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.