You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Endoscopic versus microscopic transsphenoidal pituitary adenoma surgery: a meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
World Journal of Surgical Oncology, April 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1477-7819-12-94 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yang Gao, Chunlong Zhong, Yu Wang, Siyi Xu, Yang Guo, Chenyang Dai, Yan Zheng, Yong Wang, Qizhong Luo, Jiyao Jiang |
| Abstract |
Endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery has gradually come to be regarded as a preferred option in the treatment of pituitary adenomas because of its advantages of improved visualization and its minimal invasiveness. The aim of this study was to compare and evaluate the outcomes and complications of endoscopic and microscopic transsphenoidal surgery in the treatment of pituitary adenomas. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 111 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 14% |
| Other | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 8% |
| Researcher | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 31 | 27% |
| Unknown | 25 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 62 | 55% |
| Neuroscience | 10 | 9% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 32 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2014.
All research outputs
#18,370,767
of 22,753,345 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgical Oncology
#1,014
of 2,042 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,452
of 226,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgical Oncology
#21
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,753,345 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,042 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,967 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.