↓ Skip to main content

Shifting paradigms of nontuberculous mycobacteria in cystic fibrosis

Overview of attention for article published in Respiratory Research, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
patent
4 patents
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Shifting paradigms of nontuberculous mycobacteria in cystic fibrosis
Published in
Respiratory Research, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/1465-9921-15-41
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tavs Qvist, Tania Pressler, Niels Høiby, Terese L Katzenstein

Abstract

Important paradigms of pulmonary disease with nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) are currently shifting based on an increasing attention within the field of cystic fibrosis (CF). These shifts are likely to benefit the management of all patients with pulmonary NTM, regardless of underlying pathology. Currently several key areas are being revised: The first outbreak of human NTM transmission has been proven and new evidence of biofilm growth in vivo has been demonstrated. A better understanding of the clinical impact of NTM infection has led to increased diagnostic vigilance and new recommendations for lung transplantation are under way. While recent changes have reinvigorated the interest in NTM disease, the challenge remains, whether such advances can be successfully translated into improved management and care.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 1%
Unknown 80 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 20%
Student > Bachelor 12 15%
Researcher 11 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 9%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 13 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 16%
Immunology and Microbiology 13 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 18 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2021.
All research outputs
#5,018,078
of 21,165,417 outputs
Outputs from Respiratory Research
#567
of 2,551 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,834
of 206,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Respiratory Research
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,165,417 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,551 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,950 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.