You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
| Title |
Evaluation of the acceptability, feasibility and effectiveness of two methods of involving patients with disability in developing clinical guidelines: study protocol of a randomized pragmatic pilot trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Trials, April 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1745-6215-15-118 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marie-Eve Lamontagne, Kadija Perreault, Marie-Pierre Gagnon |
| Abstract |
Despite growing interest in the importance of, and challenges associated with the involvement of patient and population (IPP) in the process of developing and adapting clinical practice guidelines (CPGs), there is a lack of knowledge about the best method to use. This is especially problematic in the field of rehabilitation, where individuals with disabilities might face many barriers to their involvement in the guideline development and adaptation process. The goal of this pilot trial is to document the acceptability, feasibility and effectiveness of two methods of involving patients with a disability (traumatic brain injury) in CPG development. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 33% |
| Spain | 1 | 17% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 80 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Unknown | 24 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 10% |
| Psychology | 5 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 14% |
| Unknown | 26 | 33% |