↓ Skip to main content

Developing anti-tobacco messages for Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples: evidence from a national cross-sectional survey

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Developing anti-tobacco messages for Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples: evidence from a national cross-sectional survey
Published in
BMC Public Health, March 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-14-250
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gillian S Gould, Kerrianne Watt, Leah Stevenson, Andy McEwen, Yvonne Cadet-James, Alan R Clough

Abstract

Smoking rates in Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples remain high, with limited impact of government measures for many subgroups. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to investigate differences in organisational practice for developing anti-tobacco messages for these target populations.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 2 2%
Malaysia 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 93 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 16 16%
Student > Master 15 15%
Researcher 12 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 10%
Student > Postgraduate 6 6%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 26 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 16 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 14%
Psychology 9 9%
Social Sciences 6 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 35 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2019.
All research outputs
#7,474,249
of 26,628,627 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#8,157
of 18,372 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,808
of 236,751 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#114
of 290 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,628,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 18,372 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,751 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 290 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.