↓ Skip to main content

Sepsis guideline implementation: benefits, pitfalls and possible solutions

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
23 X users

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sepsis guideline implementation: benefits, pitfalls and possible solutions
Published in
Critical Care, March 2014
DOI 10.1186/cc13774
Pubmed ID
Authors

Niranjan Kissoon

Abstract

Clinical practice guidelines are useful in improving quality of care and outcomes, reducing inappropriate variation in practice, promoting efficient use of resources, informing and empowering patients and informing public policy. However, difficulties arise when guidelines are poorly introduced into routine daily practice and, as a consequence, many patients do not receive the care intended or receive harmful or unnecessary care.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 2 3%
Colombia 2 3%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 68 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 10 14%
Student > Bachelor 9 12%
Professor 8 11%
Student > Postgraduate 8 11%
Student > Master 8 11%
Other 23 32%
Unknown 7 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 62%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 3%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 7 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2014.
All research outputs
#2,428,623
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,121
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,038
of 249,082 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#18
of 148 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,082 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 148 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.