You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Sepsis guideline implementation: benefits, pitfalls and possible solutions
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Care, March 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/cc13774 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Niranjan Kissoon |
Abstract |
Clinical practice guidelines are useful in improving quality of care and outcomes, reducing inappropriate variation in practice, promoting efficient use of resources, informing and empowering patients and informing public policy. However, difficulties arise when guidelines are poorly introduced into routine daily practice and, as a consequence, many patients do not receive the care intended or receive harmful or unnecessary care. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 4 | 17% |
Canada | 3 | 13% |
Spain | 3 | 13% |
Paraguay | 1 | 4% |
Ireland | 1 | 4% |
United States | 1 | 4% |
Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
Greece | 1 | 4% |
Australia | 1 | 4% |
Other | 3 | 13% |
Unknown | 4 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 16 | 70% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 13% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 13% |
Scientists | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Mexico | 2 | 3% |
Colombia | 2 | 3% |
Germany | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 68 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 10 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 12% |
Professor | 8 | 11% |
Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 11% |
Student > Master | 8 | 11% |
Other | 23 | 32% |
Unknown | 7 | 10% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 45 | 62% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 12% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 4% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 3% |
Other | 5 | 7% |
Unknown | 7 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2014.
All research outputs
#2,428,623
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,121
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,038
of 249,082 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#18
of 148 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,082 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 148 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.