You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Verbal and visual stimulation effects on rectus femoris and biceps femoris muscles during isometric and concentric
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Archives of Medicine, October 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1755-7682-6-38 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sidney B Silva, Luiz Carlos de Abreu, Vitor E Valenti, Daniel V Nogueira, Éder R Moraes, Vilma Natividade, Paulo Rogério Gallo, Dafne Herrero, Patrícia M D Zacaro |
Abstract |
Coactivation may be both desirable (injury prevention) or undesirable (strength measurement). In this context, different styles of muscle strength stimulus have being investigated. In this study we evaluated the effects of verbal and visual stimulation on rectus femoris and biceps femoris muscles contraction during isometric and concentric. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 42 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 9 | 21% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 14% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 7% |
Researcher | 3 | 7% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 7% |
Other | 4 | 10% |
Unknown | 14 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 21% |
Sports and Recreations | 6 | 14% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 7% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
Other | 3 | 7% |
Unknown | 17 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2014.
All research outputs
#20,657,128
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from International Archives of Medicine
#81
of 103 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,264
of 222,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Archives of Medicine
#7
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 222,688 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.