↓ Skip to main content

The short and long term effects of exercise training in non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis – a randomised controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Respiratory Research, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
134 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
275 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The short and long term effects of exercise training in non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis – a randomised controlled trial
Published in
Respiratory Research, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/1465-9921-15-44
Pubmed ID
Authors

Annemarie L Lee, Catherine J Hill, Nola Cecins, Sue Jenkins, Christine F McDonald, Angela T Burge, Linda Rautela, Robert G Stirling, Philip J Thompson, Anne E Holland

Abstract

Exercise training is recommended for non-cystic fibrosis (CF) bronchiectasis, but the long-term effects are unclear. This randomised controlled trial aimed to determine the effects of exercise training and review of airway clearance therapy (ACT) on exercise capacity, health related quality of life (HRQOL) and the incidence of acute exacerbations in people with non-CF bronchiectasis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 275 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 <1%
United States 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 271 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 42 15%
Student > Bachelor 39 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 9%
Researcher 22 8%
Other 17 6%
Other 54 20%
Unknown 76 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 79 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 42 15%
Psychology 18 7%
Sports and Recreations 12 4%
Unspecified 7 3%
Other 27 10%
Unknown 90 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2014.
All research outputs
#13,174,910
of 22,753,345 outputs
Outputs from Respiratory Research
#1,285
of 2,739 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,443
of 305,238 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Respiratory Research
#17
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,753,345 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,739 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,238 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.