↓ Skip to main content

On finding bicliques in bipartite graphs: a novel algorithm and its application to the integration of diverse biological data types

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
113 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
On finding bicliques in bipartite graphs: a novel algorithm and its application to the integration of diverse biological data types
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, April 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2105-15-110
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yun Zhang, Charles A Phillips, Gary L Rogers, Erich J Baker, Elissa J Chesler, Michael A Langston

Abstract

Integrating and analyzing heterogeneous genome-scale data is a huge algorithmic challenge for modern systems biology. Bipartite graphs can be useful for representing relationships across pairs of disparate data types, with the interpretation of these relationships accomplished through an enumeration of maximal bicliques. Most previously-known techniques are generally ill-suited to this foundational task, because they are relatively inefficient and without effective scaling. In this paper, a powerful new algorithm is described that produces all maximal bicliques in a bipartite graph. Unlike most previous approaches, the new method neither places undue restrictions on its input nor inflates the problem size. Efficiency is achieved through an innovative exploitation of bipartite graph structure, and through computational reductions that rapidly eliminate non-maximal candidates from the search space. An iterative selection of vertices for consideration based on non-decreasing common neighborhood sizes boosts efficiency and leads to more balanced recursion trees.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
Armenia 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
Unknown 83 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 25%
Researcher 21 24%
Student > Master 9 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 7%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 10 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 29 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 9%
Mathematics 6 7%
Social Sciences 5 6%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 12 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2021.
All research outputs
#7,229,289
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#2,741
of 7,400 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,314
of 228,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#46
of 125 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,400 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,288 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 125 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.