You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Reducing our environmental footprint and improving our health: greenhouse gas emission and land use of usual diet and mortality in EPIC-NL: a prospective cohort study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Health, April 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1476-069x-13-27 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sander Biesbroek, H Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita, Petra HM Peeters, WM Monique Verschuren, Yvonne T van der Schouw, Gerard FH Kramer, Marcelo Tyszler, Elisabeth HM Temme |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 214 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 3 | 1% |
| Unknown | 211 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 50 | 23% |
| Researcher | 40 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 10% |
| Other | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 21 | 10% |
| Unknown | 46 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 35 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 31 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 5% |
| Engineering | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 48 | 22% |
| Unknown | 62 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,370,959
of 25,381,783 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Health
#297
of 1,601 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,345
of 235,990 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Health
#5
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,381,783 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,601 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,990 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.