You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The implementation leadership scale (ILS): development of a brief measure of unit level implementation leadership
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, April 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-9-45 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gregory A Aarons, Mark G Ehrhart, Lauren R Farahnak |
| Abstract |
In healthcare and allied healthcare settings, leadership that supports effective implementation of evidenced-based practices (EBPs) is a critical concern. However, there are no empirically validated measures to assess implementation leadership. This paper describes the development, factor structure, and initial reliability and convergent and discriminant validity of a very brief measure of implementation leadership: the Implementation Leadership Scale (ILS). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 27% |
| Canada | 7 | 27% |
| Australia | 2 | 8% |
| Cyprus | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 9 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 50% |
| Scientists | 9 | 35% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 12% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 510 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 500 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 74 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 66 | 13% |
| Researcher | 62 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 48 | 9% |
| Other | 26 | 5% |
| Other | 108 | 21% |
| Unknown | 126 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 79 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 64 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 60 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 59 | 12% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 49 | 10% |
| Other | 48 | 9% |
| Unknown | 151 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2023.
All research outputs
#2,063,674
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#396
of 1,820 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,192
of 241,362 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#6
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,820 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,362 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.