You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Dosimetric advantages of a “butterfly” technique for intensity-modulated radiation therapy for young female patients with mediastinal Hodgkin’s lymphoma
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Radiation Oncology, April 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1748-717x-9-94 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Khinh Ranh Voong, Kelli McSpadden, Chelsea C Pinnix, Ferial Shihadeh, Valerie Reed, Mohammad R Salehpour, Isidora Arzu, He Wang, David Hodgson, John Garcia, Michalis Aristophanous, Bouthaina S Dabaja |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Italy | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 68 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 8 | 11% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 17 | 24% |
| Unknown | 18 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 41% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 8% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 6 | 8% |
| Engineering | 3 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 24 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2022.
All research outputs
#6,059,350
of 23,006,268 outputs
Outputs from Radiation Oncology
#256
of 2,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,480
of 227,408 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Radiation Oncology
#9
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,006,268 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,072 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,408 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.