↓ Skip to main content

Increasing the scale and adoption of population health interventions: experiences and perspectives of policy makers, practitioners, and researchers

Overview of attention for article published in Health Research Policy and Systems, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
3 policy sources
twitter
13 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
103 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
174 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Increasing the scale and adoption of population health interventions: experiences and perspectives of policy makers, practitioners, and researchers
Published in
Health Research Policy and Systems, April 2014
DOI 10.1186/1478-4505-12-18
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew J Milat, Lesley King, Robyn Newson, Luke Wolfenden, Chris Rissel, Adrian Bauman, Sally Redman

Abstract

Decisions to scale up population health interventions from small projects to wider state or national implementation is fundamental to maximising population-wide health improvements. The objectives of this study were to examine: i) how decisions to scale up interventions are currently made in practice; ii) the role that evidence plays in informing decisions to scale up interventions; and iii) the role policy makers, practitioners, and researchers play in this process.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 174 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Brazil 2 1%
Canada 2 1%
Australia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 166 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 38 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 17%
Student > Master 24 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 8%
Student > Bachelor 8 5%
Other 33 19%
Unknown 27 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 21%
Social Sciences 37 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 9%
Sports and Recreations 12 7%
Psychology 7 4%
Other 27 16%
Unknown 38 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2021.
All research outputs
#2,207,636
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Health Research Policy and Systems
#270
of 1,407 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,592
of 240,654 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Research Policy and Systems
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,407 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,654 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.