You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Early goal-directed therapy after major surgery reduces complications and duration of hospital stay. A randomised, controlled trial [ISRCTN38797445]
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, November 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1186/cc3887 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rupert Pearse, Deborah Dawson, Jayne Fawcett, Andrew Rhodes, R Michael Grounds, E David Bennett |
| Abstract |
Goal-directed therapy (GDT) has been shown to improve outcome when commenced before surgery. This requires pre-operative admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). In cardiac surgery, GDT has proved effective when commenced after surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of post-operative GDT on the incidence of complications and duration of hospital stay in patients undergoing general surgery. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 379 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 5 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 1% |
| Unknown | 359 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 58 | 15% |
| Researcher | 52 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 43 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 40 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 31 | 8% |
| Other | 107 | 28% |
| Unknown | 48 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 277 | 73% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 2% |
| Engineering | 4 | 1% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 12 | 3% |
| Unknown | 64 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2015.
All research outputs
#4,156,948
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,970
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,132
of 76,717 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#8
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,717 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.