You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Polymorphisms in Phase I and Phase II genes and breast cancer risk and relations to persistent organic pollutant exposure: a case–control study in Inuit women
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Health, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1476-069x-13-19 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mandana Ghisari, Hans Eiberg, Manhai Long, Eva C Bonefeld-Jørgensen |
| Abstract |
We have previously reported that chemicals belonging to the persistent organic pollutants (POPs) such as perfluorinated compounds (PFAS) and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) are risk factors in Breast Cancer (BC) development in Greenlandic Inuit women. The present case-control study aimed to investigate the main effect of polymorphisms in genes involved in xenobiotic metabolism and estrogen biosynthesis, CYP1A1, CYP1B1, COMT and CYP17, CYP19 and the BRCA1 founder mutation in relation to BC risk and to explore possible interactions between the gene polymorphisms and serum POP levels on BC risk in Greenlandic Inuit women. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Romania | 1 | <1% |
| Taiwan | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 111 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 20 | 18% |
| Researcher | 17 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 15 | 13% |
| Unknown | 28 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 22% |
| Environmental Science | 12 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 24 | 21% |
| Unknown | 28 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2020.
All research outputs
#1,636,820
of 24,351,425 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Health
#338
of 1,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,480
of 226,344 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Health
#10
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,351,425 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,344 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.