You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Optimisation of simulated team training through the application of learning theories: a debate for a conceptual framework
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Education, April 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6920-14-69 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Martin Stocker, Margarita Burmester, Meredith Allen |
| Abstract |
As a conceptual review, this paper will debate relevant learning theories to inform the development, design and delivery of an effective educational programme for simulated team training relevant to health professionals. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 29% |
| Australia | 4 | 11% |
| Saudi Arabia | 3 | 9% |
| Curaçao | 2 | 6% |
| Canada | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 14 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 49% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 26% |
| Scientists | 9 | 26% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 278 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 273 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 53 | 19% |
| Other | 26 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 25 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 7% |
| Other | 79 | 28% |
| Unknown | 52 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 108 | 39% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 41 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 32 | 12% |
| Psychology | 11 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 25 | 9% |
| Unknown | 57 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2018.
All research outputs
#1,707,508
of 24,932,492 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#200
of 3,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,904
of 231,147 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#9
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,932,492 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,854 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,147 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.