↓ Skip to main content

Randomized phase II study with two gemcitabine- and docetaxel-based combinations as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Translational Medicine, October 2008
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Randomized phase II study with two gemcitabine- and docetaxel-based combinations as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer
Published in
Journal of Translational Medicine, October 2008
DOI 10.1186/1479-5876-6-65
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alessandro Passardi, Lorenzo Cecconetto, Monia Dall'Agata, Claudio Dazzi, Enzo Pasquini, Giovanni Oliverio, Federica Zumaglini, Wainer Zoli, Oriana Nanni, Carlo Milandri, Giovanni Luca Frassineti, Dino Amadori

Abstract

Docetaxel and gemcitabine combinations have proven active for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The aim of the present study was to evaluate and compare two treatment schedules, one based on our own preclinical data and the other selected from the literature. Patients with stage IV NSCLC and at least one bidimensionally-measurable lesion were eligible. Adequate bone marrow reserve, normal hepatic and renal function, and an ECOG performance status of 0 to 2 were required. No prior chemotherapy was permitted. Patients were randomized to arm A (docetaxel 70 mg/m2 on day 1 and gemcitabine 900 mg/m2 on days 3-8, every 3 weeks) or B (gemcitabine 900 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8, and docetaxel 70 mg/m2 on day 8, every 3 weeks). The objective response rate was 20% (95% CI:10.0-35.9) and 18% (95% CI:8.6-33.9) in arms A and B, respectively. Disease control rates were very similar (54% in arm A and 53% in arm B). No differences were noted in median survival (32 vs. 33 weeks) or 1-year survival (33% vs. 35%). Toxicity was mild in both treatment arms. Our results highlighted acceptable activity and survival outcomes for both experimental and empirical schedules as first-line treatment of NSCLC, suggesting the potential usefulness of drug sequencing based on preclinical models. IOR 162 02.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 19%
Student > Master 6 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 16%
Other 3 9%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 2 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 47%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 16%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Sports and Recreations 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 4 13%