↓ Skip to main content

Protein and Overtraining: Potential Applications for Free-Living Athletes

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, May 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
128 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Protein and Overtraining: Potential Applications for Free-Living Athletes
Published in
Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, May 2022
DOI 10.1186/1550-2783-3-1-42
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lonnie Lowery, Cassandra E Forsythe

Abstract

Despite a more than adequate protein intake in the general population, athletes have special needs and situations that bring it to the forefront. Overtraining is one example. Hard-training athletes are different from sedentary persons from the sub-cellular to whole-organism level. Moreover, competitive, "free-living" (less-monitored) athletes often encounter negative energy balance, sub-optimal dietary variety, injuries, endocrine exacerbations and immune depression. These factors, coupled with "two-a-day" practices and in-season demands require that protein not be dismissed as automatically adequate or worse, deleterious to health. When applying research to practice settings, one should consider methodological aspects such as population specificity and control variables such as energy balance. This review will address data pertinent to the topic of athletic protein needs, particularly from a standpoint of overtraining and soft tissue recovery. Research-driven strategies for adjusting nutrition and exercise assessments will be offered for consideration. Potentially helpful nutrition interventions for preventing and treating training complications will also be presented.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 4 3%
Mali 1 <1%
Bulgaria 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Unknown 120 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 19 15%
Researcher 18 14%
Student > Master 18 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 9%
Student > Postgraduate 12 9%
Other 33 26%
Unknown 16 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 34 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 28 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 4%
Other 15 12%
Unknown 21 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2021.
All research outputs
#6,029,724
of 22,753,345 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#610
of 882 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,246
of 437,528 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#592
of 854 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,753,345 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 882 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 57.7. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,528 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 854 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.