You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A systematic review of therapeutic hypothermia for adult patients following traumatic brain injury
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, April 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/cc13835 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Samantha Crossley, Jenny Reid, Rachel McLatchie, Judith Hayton, Clair Clark, Margaret MacDougall, Peter JD Andrews |
| Abstract |
Research into therapeutic hypothermia following traumatic brain injury has been characterised by small trials of poor methodological quality, producing variable results. The Cochrane review, published in 2009, now requires updating. The aim of this systematic review is to assess the effectiveness of the application of therapeutic hypothermia to reduce death and disability when administered to adult patients who have been admitted to hospital following traumatic brain injury. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 11 | 28% |
| United States | 4 | 10% |
| Spain | 3 | 8% |
| Australia | 3 | 8% |
| Italy | 2 | 5% |
| Canada | 2 | 5% |
| South Africa | 1 | 3% |
| Chile | 1 | 3% |
| Greece | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 11 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 54% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 21% |
| Scientists | 5 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 143 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 23 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 15% |
| Researcher | 18 | 12% |
| Other | 14 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 10% |
| Other | 32 | 22% |
| Unknown | 23 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 87 | 60% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 11 | 8% |
| Unknown | 27 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2018.
All research outputs
#1,098,130
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#883
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,496
of 238,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#3
of 167 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,621 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 167 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.