↓ Skip to main content

Motivations of physicians and nurses to practice voluntary euthanasia: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Palliative Care, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Motivations of physicians and nurses to practice voluntary euthanasia: a systematic review
Published in
BMC Palliative Care, April 2014
DOI 10.1186/1472-684x-13-20
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lydi-Anne Vézina-Im, Mireille Lavoie, Pawel Krol, Marianne Olivier-D’Avignon

Abstract

While a number of reviews have explored the attitude of health professionals toward euthanasia, none of them documented their motivations to practice euthanasia. The objective of the present systematic review was to identify physicians' and nurses' motives for having the intention or for performing an act of voluntary euthanasia and compare findings from countries where the practice is legalized to those where it is not.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 2%
Unknown 89 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 22 24%
Student > Master 14 15%
Student > Postgraduate 7 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 4%
Other 15 16%
Unknown 23 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 23%
Psychology 6 7%
Social Sciences 6 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 23 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2014.
All research outputs
#18,616,159
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Palliative Care
#1,241
of 1,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,605
of 230,623 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Palliative Care
#15
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,308 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,623 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.