↓ Skip to main content

Annoyance and activity disturbance induced by high-speed railway and conventional railway noise: a contrastive case study

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Health, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Annoyance and activity disturbance induced by high-speed railway and conventional railway noise: a contrastive case study
Published in
Environmental Health, March 2014
DOI 10.1186/1476-069x-13-12
Pubmed ID
Authors

Guo-Qing Di, Qi-Li Lin, Zheng-Guang Li, Jian Kang

Abstract

High-speed railway (HR, Electrified railway with service speed above 200 km/h.) noise and conventional railway (CR, Electrified railway with service speed under 200 km/h.) noise are different in both time and frequency domain. There is an urgent need to study the influence of HR noise and consequently, develop appropriate noise evaluation index and limits for the total railway noise including HR and CR noise.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Israel 1 2%
Unknown 40 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 27%
Researcher 8 20%
Unspecified 2 5%
Lecturer 2 5%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Other 8 20%
Unknown 8 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 9 22%
Environmental Science 7 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 7%
Unspecified 2 5%
Design 2 5%
Other 7 17%
Unknown 11 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2015.
All research outputs
#18,370,767
of 22,753,345 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Health
#1,256
of 1,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,794
of 221,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Health
#19
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,753,345 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,485 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.3. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,153 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.