↓ Skip to main content

Stakeholders’ perception on the organization of chronic care: a SWOT analysis to draft avenues for health care reforms

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
191 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Stakeholders’ perception on the organization of chronic care: a SWOT analysis to draft avenues for health care reforms
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, April 2014
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-14-179
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thérèse Van Durme, Jean Macq, Sibyl Anthierens, Linda Symons, Olivier Schmitz, Dominique Paulus, Koen Van den Heede, Roy Remmen

Abstract

Adequate care for individuals living with chronic illnesses calls for a healthcare system redesign, moving from acute, disease-centered to patient-centered models. The aim of this study was to identify Belgian stakeholders' perceptions on the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats of the healthcare system for people with chronic diseases in Belgium.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 191 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 186 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 38 20%
Researcher 19 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 7%
Student > Postgraduate 12 6%
Other 40 21%
Unknown 51 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 32 17%
Business, Management and Accounting 17 9%
Social Sciences 12 6%
Computer Science 7 4%
Other 27 14%
Unknown 54 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2017.
All research outputs
#14,704,420
of 25,257,066 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#4,988
of 8,574 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,496
of 233,649 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#63
of 125 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,257,066 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,574 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 233,649 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 125 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.