You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Stakeholders’ perception on the organization of chronic care: a SWOT analysis to draft avenues for health care reforms
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, April 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-14-179 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Thérèse Van Durme, Jean Macq, Sibyl Anthierens, Linda Symons, Olivier Schmitz, Dominique Paulus, Koen Van den Heede, Roy Remmen |
Abstract |
Adequate care for individuals living with chronic illnesses calls for a healthcare system redesign, moving from acute, disease-centered to patient-centered models. The aim of this study was to identify Belgian stakeholders' perceptions on the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats of the healthcare system for people with chronic diseases in Belgium. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 193 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Denmark | 1 | <1% |
Nigeria | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Poland | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 188 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 39 | 20% |
Researcher | 20 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 7% |
Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 6% |
Other | 40 | 21% |
Unknown | 51 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 42 | 22% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 33 | 17% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 18 | 9% |
Social Sciences | 12 | 6% |
Computer Science | 7 | 4% |
Other | 27 | 14% |
Unknown | 54 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2017.
All research outputs
#14,704,420
of 25,257,066 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#4,988
of 8,574 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,496
of 233,649 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#63
of 125 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,257,066 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,574 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 233,649 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 125 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.