You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Risk of bias: a simulation study of power to detect study-level moderator effects in meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, November 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2046-4053-2-107 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Susanne Hempel, Jeremy NV Miles, Marika J Booth, Zhen Wang, Sally C Morton, Paul G Shekelle |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 43% |
| Denmark | 1 | 14% |
| Brazil | 1 | 14% |
| United States | 1 | 14% |
| Spain | 1 | 14% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 71% |
| Scientists | 2 | 29% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 57 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 26% |
| Researcher | 10 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 9 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 19 | 33% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 18% |
| Unknown | 12 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2019.
All research outputs
#5,508,102
of 22,994,508 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#952
of 2,005 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,357
of 308,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#8
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,994,508 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,005 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,050 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.