↓ Skip to main content

The clinical application of UGT1A1pharmacogenetic testing: Gene-environment interactions

Overview of attention for article published in Human Genomics, April 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The clinical application of UGT1A1pharmacogenetic testing: Gene-environment interactions
Published in
Human Genomics, April 2010
DOI 10.1186/1479-7364-4-4-238
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sara Correia Marques, Ogechi N Ikediobi

Abstract

Over the past decade, the number of pharmacogenetic tests has increased considerably, allowing for the development of our knowledge of their clinical application. The uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 gene ( UGT1A1 ) assay is an example of a pharmacogenetic test. Numerous variants have been found in UGT1A1 , the main conjugating enzyme of bilirubin and drugs such as the anticancer drug irinotecan. Recently, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recommended testing for the presence of UGT1A1*28 , an allele correlated with decreased transcriptional activity, to predict patients at risk of irinotecan toxicity. The administration of other drugs - such as inhibitors of the UGT1A1 enzyme - can clinically mimic the *28 phenotype, whereas inducers of UGT1A1 can increase the glucuronidation rate of the enzyme. The *28 polymorphism is not present in all ethnicities at a similar frequency, which suggests that it is important to study different populations to determine the clinical relevance of testing for UGT1A1*28 and to identify other clinically relevant UGT1A1 variants. Environmental factors such as lifestyle can also affect UGT1A1 activity. This review is a critical analysis of studies on drugs that can be affected by the presence of UGT1A1*28 , the distribution of this polymorphism around the globe, distinct variants that may be clinically significant in African and Asian populations and how lifestyle can affect treatment outcomes that depend on UGT1A1 activity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Nigeria 1 1%
Thailand 1 1%
Unknown 88 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 16%
Student > Bachelor 13 14%
Student > Master 12 13%
Researcher 11 12%
Other 5 5%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 28 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 17 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Engineering 4 4%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 32 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2021.
All research outputs
#17,319,369
of 25,418,993 outputs
Outputs from Human Genomics
#389
of 564 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,589
of 103,557 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Genomics
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,418,993 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 564 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,557 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.