↓ Skip to main content

The process of developing and implementing a telephone-based peer support program for postpartum depression: evidence from two randomized controlled trials

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
220 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The process of developing and implementing a telephone-based peer support program for postpartum depression: evidence from two randomized controlled trials
Published in
Trials, April 2014
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-15-131
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cindy-Lee Dennis

Abstract

A randomized controlled trial evaluated the effect of telephone-based peer support on preventing postpartum depression (PPD) among high-risk mothers. The results indicated that support provided by peer volunteers may be an effective preventative strategy. The purpose of this paper is to outline the process of developing, implementing, maintaining, and evaluating the peer support program that we used in this PPD prevention trial.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 220 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 220 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 41 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 11%
Researcher 22 10%
Student > Bachelor 17 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 5%
Other 42 19%
Unknown 61 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 60 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 39 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 30 14%
Social Sciences 12 5%
Unspecified 4 2%
Other 12 5%
Unknown 63 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2014.
All research outputs
#21,157,205
of 25,986,827 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#26
of 45 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#176,913
of 239,846 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#23
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,986,827 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 45 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one scored the same or higher as 19 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,846 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.