You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The process of developing and implementing a telephone-based peer support program for postpartum depression: evidence from two randomized controlled trials
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Trials, April 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1745-6215-15-131 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cindy-Lee Dennis |
| Abstract |
A randomized controlled trial evaluated the effect of telephone-based peer support on preventing postpartum depression (PPD) among high-risk mothers. The results indicated that support provided by peer volunteers may be an effective preventative strategy. The purpose of this paper is to outline the process of developing, implementing, maintaining, and evaluating the peer support program that we used in this PPD prevention trial. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 211 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 211 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 41 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 12% |
| Researcher | 23 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 38 | 18% |
| Unknown | 55 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 60 | 28% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 39 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 30 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 6% |
| Engineering | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 9 | 4% |
| Unknown | 58 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2014.
All research outputs
#18,371,293
of 22,754,104 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#4,745
of 5,850 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,306
of 226,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#70
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,754,104 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,850 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,127 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.