↓ Skip to main content

Simple estimators of the intensity of seasonal occurrence

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, October 2008
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Simple estimators of the intensity of seasonal occurrence
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, October 2008
DOI 10.1186/1471-2288-8-67
Pubmed ID
Authors

M Alan Brookhart, Kenneth J Rothman

Abstract

Edwards's method is a widely used approach for fitting a sine curve to a time-series of monthly frequencies. From this fitted curve, estimates of the seasonal intensity of occurrence (i.e., peak-to-low ratio of the fitted curve) can be generated. We discuss various approaches to the estimation of seasonal intensity assuming Edwards's periodic model, including maximum likelihood estimation (MLE), least squares, weighted least squares, and a new closed-form estimator based on a second-order moment statistic and non-transformed data. Through an extensive Monte Carlo simulation study, we compare the finite sample performance characteristics of the estimators discussed in this paper. Finally, all estimators and confidence interval procedures discussed are compared in a re-analysis of data on the seasonality of monocytic leukemia. We find that Edwards's estimator is substantially biased, particularly for small numbers of events and very large or small amounts of seasonality. For the common setting of rare events and moderate seasonality, the new estimator proposed in this paper yields less finite sample bias and better mean squared error than either the MLE or weighted least squares. For large studies and strong seasonality, MLE or weighted least squares appears to be the optimal analytic method among those considered. Edwards's estimator of the seasonal relative risk can exhibit substantial finite sample bias. The alternative estimators considered in this paper should be preferred.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 4%
Unknown 24 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 28%
Researcher 3 12%
Professor 3 12%
Other 2 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 8%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 7 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 28%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 12%
Social Sciences 2 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 8 32%