You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Concepts of mental capacity for patients requesting assisted suicide: a qualitative analysis of expert evidence presented to the Commission on Assisted Dying
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medical Ethics, April 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-6939-15-32 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Annabel Price, Ruaidhri McCormack, Theresa Wiseman, Matthew Hotopf |
Abstract |
In May 2013 a new Assisted Dying Bill was tabled in the House of Lords and is currently scheduled for a second reading in May 2014. The Bill was informed by the report of the Commission on Assisted Dying which itself was informed by evidence presented by invited experts.This study aims to explore how the experts presenting evidence to the Commission on Assisted Dying conceptualised mental capacity for patients requesting assisted suicide and examine these concepts particularly in relation to the principles of the Mental Capacity Act 2005. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 6 | 43% |
Canada | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 7 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 43% |
Members of the public | 4 | 29% |
Scientists | 4 | 29% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 2 | 2% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 93 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 16 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 16% |
Researcher | 10 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 8% |
Other | 7 | 7% |
Other | 16 | 17% |
Unknown | 24 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 21% |
Psychology | 15 | 16% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 13% |
Social Sciences | 11 | 11% |
Computer Science | 3 | 3% |
Other | 11 | 11% |
Unknown | 24 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2015.
All research outputs
#1,435,958
of 23,400,864 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#119
of 1,015 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,966
of 228,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#3
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,400,864 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,015 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,379 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.