You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Identification of hypoxanthine as a urine marker for non-Hodgkin lymphoma by low-mass-ion profiling
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Cancer, February 2010
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2407-10-55 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Byong Chul Yoo, Sun-Young Kong, Sang-Geun Jang, Kyung-Hee Kim, Sun-A Ahn, Weon-Seo Park, Sohee Park, Tak Yun, Hyeon-Seok Eom |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 1 | 3% |
Malaysia | 1 | 3% |
Sri Lanka | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 30 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 24% |
Student > Master | 5 | 15% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 9% |
Researcher | 3 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
Other | 6 | 18% |
Unknown | 6 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 24% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 18% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 12% |
Chemistry | 3 | 9% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 9% |
Other | 3 | 9% |
Unknown | 6 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2021.
All research outputs
#7,536,586
of 22,994,508 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#2,095
of 8,356 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,937
of 94,367 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#19
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,994,508 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,356 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,367 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.