You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Ecotoxicological effects of carbon nanotubes and cellulose nanofibers in Chlorella vulgaris
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Nanobiotechnology, April 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1477-3155-12-15 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michele M Pereira, Ludovic Mouton, Claude Yéprémian, Alain Couté, Joanne Lo, José M Marconcini, Luiz O Ladeira, Nádia RB Raposo, Humberto M Brandão, Roberta Brayner |
| Abstract |
MWCNT and CNF are interesting NPs that possess great potential for applications in various fields such as water treatment, reinforcement materials and medical devices. However, the rapid dissemination of NPs can impact the environment and in the human health. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the MWCNT and cotton CNF toxicological effects on freshwater green microalgae Chlorella vulgaris. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 108 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 20 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 12% |
| Researcher | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 19 | 17% |
| Unknown | 27 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 16% |
| Environmental Science | 15 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 13% |
| Engineering | 10 | 9% |
| Chemistry | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 13% |
| Unknown | 33 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2014.
All research outputs
#17,061,302
of 25,846,867 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#784
of 2,027 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,203
of 242,533 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#6
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,846,867 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,027 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,533 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.