You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Activation of persons living with HIV for treatment, the great study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, October 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12889-015-2382-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kevin Fiscella, Michele Boyd, Julian Brown, Jennifer Carroll, Andrea Cassells, Roberto Corales, Wendi Cross, Nayef El’Daher, Subrina Farah, Steven Fine, Richard Fowler, Ashley Hann, Amneris Luque, Jennifer Rodriquez, Mechelle Sanders, Jonathan Tobin |
| Abstract |
Patient empowerment represents a potent tool for addressing racial, ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in health care, particularly for chronic conditions such as HIV infection that require active patient engagement. This multimodal intervention, developed in concert with HIV patients and clinicians, aims to provide HIV patients with the knowledge, skills, attitudes and tools to become more activated patients. Randomized controlled trial of a multimodal intervention designed to activate persons living with HIV. The intervention includes four components: 1) use of a web-enabled hand-held device (Apple iPod Touch) loaded with a Personal Health Record (ePHR) customized for HIV patients; 2) six 90-minute group-based training sessions in use of the device, internet and the ePHR; 3) a pre-visit coaching session; and 4) clinician education regarding how they can support activated patients. Outcome measures include pre- post changes in patient activation measure score (primary outcome), eHealth literacy, patient involvement in decision-making and care, medication adherence, preventive care, and HIV Viral Load. We hypothesize that participants receiving the intervention will show greater improvement in empowerment and the intervention will reduce disparities in study outcomes. Disparities in these measures will be smaller than those in the usual care group. Findings have implications for activating persons living with HIV and for other marginalized groups living with chronic illness. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02165735 , 6/13/2014. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 119 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 5 | 4% |
| Researcher | 5 | 4% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 4% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 3% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 10% |
| Unknown | 86 | 72% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 6% |
| Engineering | 4 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 3% |
| Unknown | 90 | 75% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2020.
All research outputs
#7,536,586
of 22,994,508 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#7,957
of 14,980 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,861
of 280,523 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#152
of 283 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,994,508 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,980 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,523 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 283 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.