You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Should I stay or should I go? The impact of working time and wages on retention in the health workforce
|
---|---|
Published in |
Human Resources for Health, April 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1478-4491-12-23 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Stephanie Steinmetz, Daniel H de Vries, Kea G Tijdens |
Abstract |
Turnover in the health workforce is a concern as it is costly and detrimental to organizational performance and quality of care. Most studies have focused on the influence of individual and organizational factors on an employee's intention to quit. Inspired by the observation that providing care is based on the duration of practices, tasks and processes (issues of time) rather than exchange values (wages), this paper focuses on the influence of working-time characteristics and wages on an employee's intention to stay. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 6 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 86% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 234 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Pakistan | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 231 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 50 | 21% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 41 | 18% |
Researcher | 17 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 15 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 6% |
Other | 31 | 13% |
Unknown | 66 | 28% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Business, Management and Accounting | 51 | 22% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 13% |
Social Sciences | 27 | 12% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 9% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 7 | 3% |
Other | 26 | 11% |
Unknown | 72 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2014.
All research outputs
#7,119,409
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Human Resources for Health
#746
of 1,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,199
of 241,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Resources for Health
#15
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,261 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,744 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.