↓ Skip to main content

Developing the practice context to enable more effective pain management with older people: an action research approach

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Developing the practice context to enable more effective pain management with older people: an action research approach
Published in
Implementation Science, February 2011
DOI 10.1186/1748-5908-6-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Donna Brown, Brendan G McCormack

Abstract

This paper, which draws upon an Emancipatory Action Research (EAR) approach, unearths how the complexities of context influence the realities of nursing practice. While the intention of the project was to identify and change factors in the practice context that inhibit effective person-centred pain management practices with older people (65 years or older), reflective critical engagement with the findings identified that enhancing pain management practices with older people was dependent on cultural change in the unit as a whole.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 72 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 18%
Researcher 10 14%
Student > Master 9 12%
Other 5 7%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Other 20 27%
Unknown 11 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 26%
Social Sciences 6 8%
Unspecified 3 4%
Psychology 3 4%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 13 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2015.
All research outputs
#12,023,780
of 20,978,967 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#1,342
of 1,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,114
of 204,936 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#13
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,978,967 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,673 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,936 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.