You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Ventriculoarterial decoupling in human septic shock
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, April 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/cc13842 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fabio Guarracino, Baldassare Ferro, Andrea Morelli, Pietro Bertini, Rubia Baldassarri, Michael R Pinsky |
| Abstract |
Septic shock is the most severe manifestation of sepsis. It is characterized as a hypotensive cardiovascular state associated with multiorgan dysfunction and metabolic disturbances. Management of septic shock is targeted at preserving adequate organ perfusion pressure without precipitating pulmonary edema or massive volume overload. Cardiac dysfunction often occurs in septic shock patients and can significantly affect outcomes. One physiologic approach to detect the interaction between the heart and the circulation when both are affected is to examine ventriculoarterial coupling, which is defined by the ratio of arterial elastance (Ea) to left ventricular end-systolic elastance (Ees). In this study, we analyzed ventriculoarterial coupling in a cohort of patients admitted to ICUs who presented with vs without septic shock. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 2 | 14% |
| United States | 2 | 14% |
| Norway | 1 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 7% |
| Greece | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 7 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 79% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 21% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 143 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 24 | 17% |
| Researcher | 24 | 17% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 19 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 8% |
| Other | 29 | 20% |
| Unknown | 27 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 91 | 63% |
| Engineering | 5 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 8 | 6% |
| Unknown | 33 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2022.
All research outputs
#3,019,657
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,524
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,201
of 241,719 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#29
of 172 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,719 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 172 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.