↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of different recruitment and randomisation methods in a trial of general practitioner-led interventions to increase physical activity: a randomised controlled feasibility study with…

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
139 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluation of different recruitment and randomisation methods in a trial of general practitioner-led interventions to increase physical activity: a randomised controlled feasibility study with factorial design
Published in
Trials, April 2014
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-15-134
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fiona C Warren, Kate Stych, Margaret Thorogood, Deborah J Sharp, Marie Murphy, Katrina M Turner, Tim A Holt, Aidan Searle, Susan Bryant, Caroline Huxley, Rod S Taylor, John L Campbell, Melvyn Hillsdon

Abstract

Interventions promoting physical activity by General Practitioners (GPs) lack a strong evidence base. Recruiting participants to trials in primary care is challenging. We investigated the feasibility of (i) delivering three interventions to promote physical activity in inactive participants and (ii) different methods of participant recruitment and randomised allocation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 135 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 18%
Student > Master 24 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 11%
Student > Bachelor 8 6%
Other 7 5%
Other 27 19%
Unknown 33 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 10%
Sports and Recreations 11 8%
Psychology 9 6%
Social Sciences 7 5%
Other 19 14%
Unknown 39 28%