↓ Skip to main content

Pre-referral rectal artesunate in severe malaria: flawed trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pre-referral rectal artesunate in severe malaria: flawed trial
Published in
Trials, August 2011
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-12-188
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karim F Hirji, Zulfiqarali G Premji

Abstract

Immediate injectable treatment is essential for severe malaria. Otherwise, the afflicted risk lifelong impairment or death. In rural areas of Africa and Asia, appropriate care is often miles away. In 2009, Melba Gomes and her colleagues published the findings of a randomized, placebo-controlled trial of rectal artesunate for suspected severe malaria in such remote areas. Enrolling nearly 18,000 cases, the aim was to evaluate whether, as patients were in transit to a health facility, a pre-referral artesunate suppository blocked disease progression sufficiently to reduce these risks. The affirmative findings of this, the only trial on the issue thus far, have led the WHO to endorse rectal artesunate as a pre-referral treatment for severe malaria. In the light of its public health importance and because its scientific quality has not been assessed for a systematic review, our paper provides a detailed evaluation of the design, conduct, analysis, reporting, and practical features of this trial.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 1%
Pakistan 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 94 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 16%
Student > Master 13 13%
Student > Bachelor 10 10%
Student > Postgraduate 9 9%
Other 8 8%
Other 25 25%
Unknown 18 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 42%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 4%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 24 24%