You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
LEOPARD syndrome: clinical dilemmas in differential diagnosis of RASopathies
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medical Genomics, April 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2350-15-44 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Claudia Santoro, Giuseppe Pacileo, Giuseppe Limongelli, Saverio Scianguetta, Teresa Giugliano, Giulio Piluso, Fulvio Della Ragione, Mario Cirillo, Giuseppe Mirone, Silverio Perrotta |
Abstract |
Diagnosis within RASopathies still represents a challenge. Nevertheless, many efforts have been made by clinicians to identify specific clinical features which might help in differentiating one disorder from another. Here, we describe a child initially diagnosed with Neurofibromatosis-Noonan syndrome. The follow-up of the proband, the clinical evaluation of his father together with a gene-by-gene testing approach led us to the proper diagnosis. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Colombia | 2 | 4% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 53 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 9 | 16% |
Other | 6 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
Other | 15 | 27% |
Unknown | 12 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 52% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 9% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 7% |
Computer Science | 2 | 4% |
Neuroscience | 1 | 2% |
Other | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 14 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2014.
All research outputs
#22,759,802
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Genomics
#2,010
of 2,444 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#209,411
of 241,649 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Genomics
#33
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,444 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,649 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.