↓ Skip to main content

Spinal cord stimulation in the treatment of refractory angina: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, March 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
124 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
143 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Spinal cord stimulation in the treatment of refractory angina: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
Published in
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, March 2009
DOI 10.1186/1471-2261-9-13
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rod S Taylor, Jessica De Vries, Eric Buchser, Mike JL DeJongste

Abstract

The aim of this paper was undertake a systematic review and meta-analysis of the use of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in the management of refractory angina.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 3%
Finland 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 135 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 13%
Other 13 9%
Student > Postgraduate 11 8%
Student > Master 11 8%
Student > Bachelor 11 8%
Other 44 31%
Unknown 35 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 64 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 9%
Unspecified 7 5%
Neuroscience 6 4%
Psychology 4 3%
Other 14 10%
Unknown 35 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2022.
All research outputs
#3,823,981
of 22,994,508 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
#157
of 1,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,852
of 93,780 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,994,508 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,635 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,780 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them