↓ Skip to main content

Day and night heat stress trigger different transcriptomic responses in green and ripening grapevine (vitis vinifera) fruit

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Plant Biology, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
186 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Day and night heat stress trigger different transcriptomic responses in green and ripening grapevine (vitis vinifera) fruit
Published in
BMC Plant Biology, April 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2229-14-108
Pubmed ID
Authors

Markus Rienth, Laurent Torregrosa, Nathalie Luchaire, Ratthaphon Chatbanyong, David Lecourieux, Mary T Kelly, Charles Romieu

Abstract

Global climate change will noticeably affect plant vegetative and reproductive development. The recent increase in temperatures has already impacted yields and composition of berries in many grapevine-growing regions. Physiological processes underlying temperature response and tolerance of the grapevine fruit have not been extensively investigated. To date, all studies investigating the molecular regulation of fleshly fruit response to abiotic stress were only conducted during the day, overlooking possible critical night-specific variations. The present study explores the night and day transcriptomic response of grapevine fruit to heat stress at several developmental stages. Short heat stresses (2 h) were applied at day and night to vines bearing clusters sequentially ordered according to the developmental stages along their vertical axes. The recently proposed microvine model (DRCF-Dwarf Rapid Cycling and Continuous Flowering) was grown in climatic chambers in order to circumvent common constraints and biases inevitable in field experiments with perennial macrovines. Post-véraison berry heterogeneity within clusters was avoided by constituting homogenous batches following organic acids and sugars measurements of individual berries. A whole genome transcriptomic approach was subsequently conducted using NimbleGen 090818 Vitis 12X (30 K) microarrays.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 186 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
New Zealand 1 <1%
Uruguay 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Unknown 183 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 22%
Researcher 37 20%
Student > Master 19 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 9%
Student > Bachelor 16 9%
Other 24 13%
Unknown 33 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 110 59%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 3%
Environmental Science 5 3%
Engineering 3 2%
Other 7 4%
Unknown 41 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2014.
All research outputs
#17,719,891
of 22,754,104 outputs
Outputs from BMC Plant Biology
#1,869
of 3,233 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,977
of 227,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Plant Biology
#23
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,754,104 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,233 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,639 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.