↓ Skip to main content

Circumstances and outcomes of falls among high risk community-dwelling older adults

Overview of attention for article published in Injury Epidemiology, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
210 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Circumstances and outcomes of falls among high risk community-dwelling older adults
Published in
Injury Epidemiology, March 2014
DOI 10.1186/2197-1714-1-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Judy A Stevens, Jane E Mahoney, Heidi Ehrenreich

Abstract

For older adults, falls threaten their health, independence, and quality of life. Knowing the circumstances surrounding falls is essential for understanding how behavioral and environmental factors interact in fall events. It is also important for developing and implementing interventions that are effective and acceptable to older adults. This study investigated the circumstances and injury outcomes of falls among community-dwelling older adults at high risk of falling. In this secondary analysis, we examined the circumstances and outcomes of falls experienced by 328 participants in the Dane County (Wisconsin) Safety Assessment for Elders (SAFE) Research Study. SAFE was a randomized controlled trial of a community-based multifactorial falls intervention for older adults at high risk for falls, conducted from October 2002 to December 2007. Participants were community-dwelling adults aged ≥65 years who reported at least one fall during the year after study enrollment. Falls were collected prospectively using monthly calendars. Everyone who reported a fall was contacted by telephone to determine the circumstances surrounding the event. Injury outcomes were defined as none, mild (injury reported but no treatment sought), moderate (treatment for any injury except head injury or fracture), and severe (treatment for head injury or fracture). Data were available for 1,172 falls. A generalized linear mixed model analysis showed that being age ≥85 (OR = 2.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.2-3.9), female (OR = 2.1, 95% CI = 1.3-3.4), falling backward and landing flat (OR = 5.6, 95% CI = 2.9-10.5), sideways (OR = 4.6, 95% CI = 2.6-8.0) and forward (OR = 3.3, 95% CI = 2.0-5.7) were significantly associated with the likelihood of injury. Of 783 falls inside the home, falls in the bathroom were more than twice as likely to result in an injury compared to falls in the living room (OR = 2.4, 95% CI = 1.2-4.9). Most falls among these high risk older adults occurred inside the home. The likelihood of injury in the bathroom supports the need for safety modifications such as grab bars, and may indicate a need for assistance with bathing. These findings will help clinicians tailor fall prevention for their patients and have practical implications for retirement and assisted living communities and community-based fall prevention programs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 210 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Unknown 208 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 27 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 12%
Student > Master 25 12%
Researcher 23 11%
Other 18 9%
Other 39 19%
Unknown 53 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 34 16%
Sports and Recreations 15 7%
Engineering 12 6%
Design 8 4%
Other 43 20%
Unknown 61 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2022.
All research outputs
#8,650,860
of 25,663,438 outputs
Outputs from Injury Epidemiology
#245
of 412 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,918
of 237,549 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Injury Epidemiology
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,663,438 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 412 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.1. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 237,549 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.