↓ Skip to main content

The multiple meanings of global health governance: a call for conceptual clarity

Overview of attention for article published in Globalization and Health, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
7 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
328 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The multiple meanings of global health governance: a call for conceptual clarity
Published in
Globalization and Health, April 2014
DOI 10.1186/1744-8603-10-28
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kelley Lee, Adam Kamradt-Scott

Abstract

The term global health governance (GHG) is now widely used, with over one thousand works published in the scholarly literature, almost all since 2002. Amid this rapid growth there is considerable variation in how the term is defined and applied, generating confusion as to the boundaries of the subject, the perceived problems in practice, and the goals to be achieved through institutional reform.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 328 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Serbia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 325 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 72 22%
Student > Bachelor 42 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 12%
Researcher 27 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 5%
Other 53 16%
Unknown 78 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 86 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 64 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 36 11%
Arts and Humanities 9 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 2%
Other 42 13%
Unknown 85 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2023.
All research outputs
#2,089,191
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Globalization and Health
#346
of 1,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,614
of 242,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Globalization and Health
#8
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,226 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,066 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.