Title |
Use of a semi-field system to evaluate the efficacy of topical repellents under user conditions provides a disease exposure free technique comparable with field data
|
---|---|
Published in |
Malaria Journal, April 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1475-2875-13-159 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Onyango Sangoro, Dickson Lweitojera, Emmanuel Simfukwe, Hassan Ngonyani, Edgar Mbeyela, Daniel Lugiko, Japhet Kihonda, Marta Maia, Sarah Moore |
Abstract |
Before topical repellents can be employed as interventions against arthropod bites, their efficacy must be established. Currently, laboratory or field tests, using human volunteers, are the main methods used for assessing the efficacy of topical repellents. However, laboratory tests are not representative of real life conditions under which repellents are used and field-testing potentially exposes human volunteers to disease. There is, therefore, a need to develop methods to test efficacy of repellents under real life conditions while minimizing volunteer exposure to disease. |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 46 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 12 | 25% |
Student > Master | 6 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 8% |
Librarian | 3 | 6% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 6% |
Other | 9 | 19% |
Unknown | 11 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 17% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 15% |
Environmental Science | 5 | 10% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 8% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 6% |
Other | 8 | 17% |
Unknown | 13 | 27% |