↓ Skip to main content

Article

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, January 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
132 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Published in
Critical Care, January 2007
DOI 10.1186/cc5703
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ivan Chytra, Richard Pradl, Roman Bosman, Petr Pelnář, Eduard Kasal, Alexandra Židková

Abstract

Esophageal Doppler was confirmed as a useful non-invasive tool for management of fluid replacement in elective surgery. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of early optimization of intravascular volume using esophageal Doppler on blood lactate levels and organ dysfunction development in comparison with standard hemodynamic management in multiple-trauma patients.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 3 3%
Spain 2 2%
Egypt 1 1%
Romania 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
Unknown 90 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 18%
Student > Postgraduate 15 15%
Other 11 11%
Student > Master 9 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 7%
Other 33 34%
Unknown 5 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 77 79%
Unspecified 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 11 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2007.
All research outputs
#2,015,900
of 3,619,417 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,398
of 2,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,227
of 51,652 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#10
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 3,619,417 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,150 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 51,652 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.